OpenAI CEO on Artificial Intelligence Changing Society

I don't trust this guy.

What I've learnt in my 5 decades is that we are terrible at predicting the future because a new change that we cannot imagine causes a major paradigm shift.

He literally said that jobs will be eliminated and the rich will get richer. Then he said that we will all get government hand outs of 1/8 billion per person. He perfectly described a dystopian dictatorship. He literally just described how his company will destroy our world

What is never questioned is the axiom between the speed of our evolution and the recognition of its destructive pattern in previous civilizations.

He’s letting us know very subtly: “We’re going to negatively affect a lot of people doing this, but not everybody.” 😁

I love how Eddie Bravo gets checked on everything and this dude gets to monologue about eliminating society

One thing I wanted to know. It shook me first to see that AI does GREAT Artworks, even now almost replacing alot of designers. Then I saw that even music production will be replaced. Then I asked myself: Isn't that a bad thing? Like the feeling of making a drawing thats really great over hours and days, it was rare and fullfilling. Creating music and vibing to it all done by an AI in seconds with unlimited results that alot of them are really good even now. Thats depressing to me. I mean what do we live for? To relax and not do any work? To have everything we want at the touch of a button? Even with tech now we see that people notice that it doesn't really make life better. Easier, faster doesn't equal more fun or better. I think the mindset we have is going in a direction we cannot stop. Don't get me wrong I'm a developer/artist myself and these things ARE exciting but also if they will replace everything we do. Whats the point of living? Humans are designed to do things, not to have fun all the time, get drunk or relax. That sounds good in theory but is actual hell. What do we talk about with people then? There is only so much to explore in the world. The real things to explore are internal, are creative and deep. EDIT: I want to add: Even the worst case I describe here will be better than living in some time of our human history. Being tortured or living through illness is of course a lot worse. But I think we should always aim to have a better future for our children and I see a potential that it wont be as we imagine it to be. And to be honest, I dont think we have a choice anyways because its not a democratic choice we have to develop these AIs, because if WE don't do it, actors like the CCP will do it to ensure their weird reality. And even without china, its just like the atom bomb, we will discover it and use it. Bad or good will both be present and we need to be careful which I'm REALLY afraid we are not. Or does any social network face consequences for the mental issues they created? Just think about it and I'm open for anyone to discuss this topic. I love the comments that tell their opinion of the future :) Bladerunner is not so wrong after all... (not an English native speaker, please excuse my mistakes)

I like it when Joe holds someone to an answer. "Hmmmmm..... back to the original question...."

Sam admitted he was wrong multiple times about how AI would develop. Although i appreciate his honesty, makes me suspect that the future will be radically different from what he or anyone else predicts

This guy will help aid the downfall of humanity

Just remember that he doesn't control AI. He just made a monopoly around a discovery in the AI/ML academic community, specifically a paper from Google, that proved the attention mechanism "is all you need" to train large scale models. This allowed us to scale and train larger and larger statistical (deep learning) models that predict the next word given a sequence of words. Previous large language models before this paper were using too complex architectures and the compute power wouldn't allow training models with datasets the size of the Internet and more. This is called generative AI today, but it's like monopolizing light bulbs after they were discovered. The math is published and it's not too complex to reproduce. Look up hugging face and the LLM leaderboard and you'll find 100s of open source language models that compete with OpenAI. This is called a bubble. It will pop. Models like these will run offline in your house in the next 5 years.

He is referring to Ray Kurzweil's "singularity" theory - - a good and important read

Just say NO to digital ID, social credit system, digital currency, police state, vaccine passport, planned obsolescence, & WEF tyranny.

This guy answers less questions than the CIA guy

AnAGI with no bias doesn’t exist. These things will always have the bias of the people who made them.

Honestly i think we are headed down the Bladerunner rabbit hole as far as AI is concerned.....Alexa is basically JOI in it's most primitive form,and we have all the tools in other areas....internet banking,GPS for your car,mobile phone for social media,your fitbit watch that monitors your vitals,your Spotify,your Cloud based media and other stuff will be collated and brought together in one entity that you can pretty much run and control your life with.Your AI will naturally be paired with any device you personally own and all of this of course will be voice interactive but it will be intelligent enough to give you ideas and suggestions to improve your life with your own personal AI

You had the chance to put him in a chokehold and resolve the issue right there...wtf Joe 🤨

Joe is amazing at asking the right questions and letting the person talk uninterrupted

He has immediately become legendary

That long pause at the beginning says it all