$449 Dyson Fan vs. $15 Walmart Fan: Will Dyson Lose AGAIN?!
70,417
Published 2023-06-29
Original video: • $649 Dyson Fan vs. $15 Walmart Fan: T...
If you liked this video, I’d really appreciate you giving me a like and subscribing, it helps a whole lot. Also feel free to follow me on any of my social media pages listed below (or all of them)!
Subscribe to me on YouTube: youtube.com/markspurrell?sub_confirmation=1
Twitter: www.twitter.com/MarkSpurrellYT
Instagram: www.instagram.com/MarkSpurrell
My Gear:
Sony a7iv: amzn.to/3HWSQt8
Sony a6400: amzn.to/2LWUFf5
Sony 24-70 2.8 GM: amzn.to/3sT3uXT
Tamron 17-28 2.8: amzn.to/3om8Mrp
Edelkrone Slider Plus: amzn.to/2YjvaqC
Sachtler Ace M Tripod: amzn.to/39m1fEO
Disclaimer: Some links in this description are Affiliate or Amazon Affiliate links. Ordering from a merchant after clicking on these links will provide a small amount of profit to support the channel at no extra cost to you. Thanks!
I’m a tech nerd at heart, but I also love filmmaking. Follow your passion. Fight for what you believe in. Never give up.
Mark
All Comments (21)
-
If you stand behind a standard fan and speak into it, your voice will sound like a Dalek. I bet the Dyson can't do that.
-
Dyson is "easier to clean" because you can't clean the dusty fan and internal pathways. I don't see how this is an advantage.
-
Dyson fans are so absurd they cross the line from "creative, innovative design" to "reinvented wheels for people with too much money and not enough sense".
-
If this one does just as good you might as well make a fan review channel
-
Laminar vs Turbulent air flow likely the reason the Dyson was able to move more air, further.
-
Love this comparison series!! Do more :)
-
Thank you for this video. I just watched the video from 2 years ago and got to watch this new one after 3 days you realeased it. I just came at the right time. I liked the last comment regarding the value. I agree if you buy two or even more, not 10, but a a few more, one could get a lot of airflow at at a lower speed, hence quieter and more uniform. That if the room is big enough to host more fans.
-
As the saying goes, If it ain't broke, don't fix it
-
I just have to say, I love the consistency of the NASA shirt in both review videos! Awesome review! 😆
-
Simple, and informative appreciate you.
-
Thank you for your work. For the money I will get the old style
-
Good job Mark man!
-
I bought a 50$ Electrolux 3 years ago to help me through the hot summers and it's perfect. 6 speeds, timer function, swing function, and it has 5 blades instead of the cheapest 3, making it a lot quieter. It emits a nice quiet hum at night helping me to fall asleep. Basically it's just a bit more nuanced "cheapo" fan that perfectly does it's job. But paying 450$ for that thing? Get outta here.
-
Great Review!!
-
Really cool analysis and a great improvement of test measures after the previous one. It puts things on proper perspective of what you get vs what you pay. One observation - you have not measured the watts of more expensive traditional fan. It is more of formality than information, but I would still consider it a good thing to do in a well constructed review and analysis.
-
Thanks for doing this
-
A few years ago I bought some Vornado fans, and they beat the pants off a couple of other fans I have, both for power efficiency and pushing air across the room. They don't oscillate, but they coooooool!
-
I commented on the video 2 years ago, I was still at uni 😂. As I explained before, you are actually moving less air at a reduced speed with the Dyson design ("bladeless"). On your next video, I'd recommend you show a CFD or air flow simulation. The reason why you got more air from the Dyson at a further distance is because it covers a smaller angle therefore is more directional compared to the open fan which has a wider angle thus shorter distance
-
Good Job…Thank You !
-
Mark, nice comparison. Where did you buy the tall shelf behind you?
