Music Producer Vs. AI Beatmaker: Can you hear the difference?

idk why i was so serious listening to all these 😂 didn’t want to hate on someone by accident lol everyone had so much fun with this tho this was dope. appreciate you Simon!

Respect on the beginners mentality

pop A soundin like a tutorial video 💀

Loved being apart of this video. Thank you to all the producers who guessed the beats.

Dude this video is incredible, thank you for having me on bro!

I’m just happy to see my dog making an appearance in the video😌😂… thank you for having me, this was dope!

Lowkey that little speech at the end was needed bc of AI anxiety

"ey, how you doing? It's Drizzy Drake. Y'all seen my video the other day?" 💀🤣🤣🤣

10:47 was beautifully said. Keep going man you have a great mentality

The beginner producer is my son, I am so proud of him.

the fact that trap c was ai is genuinely INSANE 😭

I feel like an order for AI to take over is if people stop engaging with other people in studios,just in the studio having fun and joking around while making a good beat is what brings us together, I don’t see ai doing that in the future🤷🏾‍♂️ but money talks so

Bro, that sound at 10:23 was uncalled for... Had me alt+tabbin' so fast.

I need that R&B B to be uploaded as a full beat right now

I really like that you didn't skirt the issue in this video. How honest your question was with the beginner producer too. He has a great mindset about it. One aspect that wasn't covered here is that humans will always have one edge over AI and that is experimentation. Ai will always be limited to trends at its core, whereas humans will always have personal expression and experimentation in the mix. Great video 👏

The Drake at the beginning 😂😂😂 Love the honest Conversation at the End!!! Great Video and Good Job Judges 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

R&B B I need it on Spotify

I love the beginner's takeaway at the end. Keep it up my man 🔥🔥🔥

“Drawing apples is my passion” B a n a n a

As AIs essentially stitch together fragments of existing works to create "original" beats, images, stories and other creations one might say that it engages in a form of digital alchemy that transforms the raw materials of human creativity into something new. This process, raises critical questions which demand to be answered especially whether or not artists have the right to receive fair compensation for those tracks which could never have been generated had their worke not contributed to the AI's training, however indirectly. I posit that a model must be instituted enforce fair use where AI is concerned in order to ensure that where every AI-generated piece, whether a sound, track, or image, incurs a fractional cost to be deposited into a fund dedicated to distributing earnings to artists wherever they may be deserved, acknowledging their indirect contribution to the creation process, financially and however else otherwise. There also exists other alternative solutions one of which ammounts to the obfuscation of ones works from the prying, unwelcome eyes of AI. Visual artists are already pioneering technologies such as these to shield their works from crawlers used to feed AI models which distorts images in such a way that confuses machine learning algorithms and renders the works protected by this technology as unusable noise. This technique suggests that there exists a possible solution for other mediums, one which promises to safeguard one's intellectual property artistic and otherwise across all mediums from unauthorized AI consumption. The challenge then remains to craft a mechanism—either through collective action or regulatory intervention—that will ensure artists are credited and compensated for their work's role in training AI.