US Forces vs Houthi Militia In The Red Sea | Balance Of Power | Insider
134,737
Published 2024-04-17
MORE BALANCE OF POWER VIDEOS:
USA vs China Aircraft Carriers | Balance Of Power | Insider
• USA vs China Aircraft Carriers | Bala...
Comparing USA and Russia's Best MLRS In Ukraine | Balance Of Power | Insider News
• Comparing USA and Russia's Best MLRS ...
00:00 - Intro
00:34 - Missiles — Tomahawk, Hellfire, Iranian-Made Missiles, ASBM
3:24 - Aircraft — Reaper, Hornet, Seahawk
5:58 - Threats — Spy Radar Systems
7:01 - Navy — Carriers And Destroyers
9:39 - Houthis' Stakes
10:37 - The Future — Yemen, Iran, US
11:50 - Balance Of Power
12:25 - Credits
------------------------------------------------------
#yemen #iran #insider
Insider's mission is to inform and inspire.
Visit our homepage for the top stories of the day: www.businessinsider.com/
Insider on Facebook: www.facebook.com/insider
Insider on Instagram: www.instagram.com/insider
Insider on Twitter: twitter.com/thisisinsider
Insider on Snapchat: www.snapchat.com/discover/Insider/2708030621
Insider on TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@insider
Houthi Militia Vs US Forces In The Red Sea | Balance Of Power | Insider
All Comments (21)
-
@1:16 I was on that ship, USS Laboon during that strike. That was headed to Syria.
-
Houthi are the first in the world to use ASBM directly in war
-
Another fact is that the drone or missiles used by the Houthi cost between 3,000 -50,000 dollars. The missiles used by the US to shoot done the Houthi droes/missiles cost between one - 2 million dollars!
-
"Irianian Backed" vs "US Backed Isreal/Mossad"
-
Some very useful information here. Well done.
-
So .. with all those powerful toys .. why Houthis keep launching missiles ?
-
Loved this documentary
-
dude looked like AI generated.
-
Thank you for your service, Sir.
-
Thanks for your honesty.
-
Tomahawks haven't been armed with nuclear warheads since the 80's
-
That's why it's called asymmetric warfare. On the one hand, multi-million weapons with expensively trained personnel, on the other, relatively cheap weapons that can be operated by talented and fanatical teenagers. Guess who´s winning.
-
lol @1:50 he calls it a 'pocket of yemen they control', google 'houthi controlled yemen' and 'yemen population density map' and you will find they overlap.
-
The US and it's dogs are losing to a bunch of teenagers in flip-flops ThE BeSt ArMy iN tHe WoRlD
-
We're talking about asymmetrical warfare, yet don't discount the Houthis. Remember history has taught us the underdogs can lose the battles but still win the war. America vs UK, NVA vs USA, Afghan vs USSR and USA, Somalia vs USA.
-
Our weapons are overpriced.
-
We need AWACS in a networked drone system that can autonomously loiter land recharge and take back off. Palmer Lucky has some interesting new weapons featuring a Lattice network.
-
So some conclusions. The weapons of the West, despite all their technical perfection (or rather precisely because of their technical perfection), are inferior to the weapons used by the Houthis in effectiveness. And here we are not even talking about hitting targets. The Houthis turn out to be the winners when their missile, at a cost of ten thousand dollars, is fired several anti-missiles, at a cost of up to a million dollars. Their winning strategy is to force the United States to use its weapons as often as possible. The degree of risk, even if most Houthi attacks are repelled, some of them reach the target. And it pays off not even because of the huge gap in price between the tool used and the target it hits. And due to the fact that the possibility of suffering from such an attack makes the risk of sailing there unacceptable for peaceful vessels. It looks like a losing situation.
-
one thing they fail to mention is that the houthis are only targeting jewish ships
-
Can you explain what "nucular" is? It wasn't very nuCLEAR.