THE PIXAR BLOOPER THEORY: an alternative to the pixar theory

Responding to some common questions I've been seeing about this theory: 1) Isn’t this all just a bunch of gags / jokes made by the animators for fun? Yeah of course. That doesn’t mean I can’t make a ridiculous, overly dramatic theory about them for fun too. That’s what 99% of fan theories are! And that doesn’t mean you can’t try and poke holes in the theory either, that’s all part of the fun too. 2) Is Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Chip 'n Dale: Rescue Rangers, or any other media with this type of meta premise a part of the Pixar Metaverse? Maybe, but I really only wanted to strictly include media that directly shows Pixar characters. Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny have both made appearances at the Oscars (never the same ones as Pixar characters), and they’re both in Who Framed Roger Rabbit, but that still feels like a little bit of a thin connection. 3) Couldn’t Slim have just swallowed a much smaller type of bug? Like a gnat or fruit fly? It seems like all the bugs in A Bugs Life are all relatively the same size. In real life Stick Bugs and Caterpillars are much bigger than Ants, but they are all more or less the same size in the movie. This seems to imply that there would be no “tiny bug” characters in the Bugs life world for Slim to swallow. 4) How could the Toys have internal organs if we’ve seen them get ripped apart and have stuffing on the inside? We’ve only seen the insides of a Toy inside the fictional Toy Story movies. Everything we see in those movies is fictional. We see people get ripped apart in live action movies all the time and don’t assume that it’s real. The fact that they eat in the metaverse implies they aren’t just full of stuffing. 5) Why didn’t I mention the bonus credits scene from Cars that shows them watching other Pixar movies, but with Cars as actors? This is a really funny bonus gag, but it’s not part of the metaverse. This clip shows movies inside of the fictional Cars movie universe, which are just movies inside of the Pixar metaverse, which are just bonus clips in real life. Just like “Lightyear”, it’s a whole new deeper layer of movies within movies. I call this layer the “Pixar Infraverse” 6) What about product tie-in commercials that feature Pixar characters? Are they part of the metaverse? Yes! Every McDonald’s commercial that features a Pixar character is in the metaverse! So are Pixar amusement park ride presentations, custom ABC bumpers and the Toy Story Funday Football. I didn’t mention any of this because they don’t really tell us anything new, and the video was already getting very long. I also originally had a segment about a Disney+ short film “Your Friend The Rat” that shows the metaverse actor for Remy the rat, but I cut it out for pacing. It’s on Patreon if you’re interested!

“IT’S ALL CANON THEY’RE ALL CONNECTED” bro is turning into matpat

This is why in the movie Chip and Dale rescue rangers, ugly sonic is a hobo. It just ties perfectly with the animation metaverse.

I think it's interesting how he never once mentions the cars credits where the characters are watching car versions of previous Pixar films.

This theory would actually make a neat series as an allegory to how Hollywood often disrespects animation as a medium.

I love how everytime you do a theory, you think it's gonna be simple, but then you go down a rabbit hole that makes you go completely insane.

“Who Framed Roger Rabbit” is probably the most well-known example of a cartoon metaverse, and probably the most likely universe which a lot of these animated bloopers and interviews take place in.

I’m sorry, it’s just really funny how you have ominous music and you hear “TOYS don’t eat”

This makes the scenes in toy story where parts of their body are torn or fallen off even more horrifying

Honestly, the fact that the Incredibles actor are so desperate to making the interviewer to see them as real people is actually pretty sad, given that they were the first actual human characters Pixar had as main characters and that even THEY don‘t have the same rights as real humans.

It also makes a LOT of sense that the Incredibles characters would be more in denial about being cartoons, because the Incredibles is one of the more "realistic" Pixar films. All the characters act like humans, they aren't toys or talking bugs, they were created to feel human. So if you felt like a human, acted like a human, and thought like a human, wouldn't you feel uncomfortable with the idea that you aren't really a human, but instead just a cartoon character?

DUDE, you know the implication of the actors created solely for that role blends well with AI's projection of no new actors in the future, just recycling dead celebrities over and over and over again.

3:44 I became extremely focused on the video when the ad started, my autism very much enjoys how much it was like ones I used to see on TV

Imagine being a janitor or an assistant at an animation studio, end up in a room where you weren't supossed to be, and it's full of uncanny human-looking beings on their lunch break eating burritos ☠️

With the dissappearence of MatPat, creates the sudden reappearance of another beloved theorist.

DUDE THE SPONSORED PART WAS SO WELL MADE

Imma be real, that Oscar speech said (IN MY OPINION) was a reference to "Who framed roger rabbit?" Refering that "Cartoons" live a lower class life in the real world. And after watching this video, I can tell it has just widered my view of this, cause this level of meta really goes well from the 40s cartoons to the actual 3D renders being seen as less in the showbiz

The "bug" swallowing a bug makes me think the bugs might actually be monsters from the monsters Inc universe that look like bugs. That's why the bird has to be mechanical.

Is nobody talking about how entertaining, fun and cool the sponsor bit is?

IT’S COMMENTARY ON HOLLYWOOD……. Cult-like happiness, buying into the belief that you’d be nothing without it… that your fans only appreciate your movie and could care less about what happens to you behind the scenes or after your washed up. GENIUS.