[Introductory] Metaphysical “learning theory”: Part 4: Human cognitive-perceptual syntax (HCPS)

Published 2023-11-14

All Comments (6)
  • @siriusBhive
    Music is more representative to emotions. Sound influences mathematics. But there is no particular play list other than the voice instrument and body mind to refine. The ears in the heart are 5th 6th and 7th i believe onto the next Octave. Thank you Brother
  • @lukehamilton7216
    I wear glasses and I can’t help but think they have only crippled my vision over the years. I was (and still am) heavily inclined towards generalizing my vision and started at a very low strength prescription. Now that my vision is blurry though maybe I can learn to make use of the permanent hyper generalization 😄
  • @adamlindfors5082
    Before I got into the CTMU, ideas that resembled many CTMU concepts had occured to me before I had even heard about it. I had the idea that every real identity has to evolve from a state of just pure ontological possibility, and that every structure which satisfy those the criterias for existence, existence is inevitable. The MAP principle occured to me as a consequence of that realization, but I didnt really further explore what it entailed for reality except that every real identity has to be completely self-generated. I also recall having thought about the possibility of constructing a theory which must be true in the sense that the CTMU are. I would probably have developed these ideas further since these ideas occured to me in my 16-17s where I had no formal education in logic, philosophy or more advanced mathematics. Could this be interpreted in the CTMU? I have heard that Chris have talked about the mind functioning like an antenna, so perhaps that is was had happen?
  • @michaelmack9168
    Exploratory non-answer personal testimony ( for anyone not familiar with some notions within the paragraph, self-reference* to CTMU terminology and ideas from Ra Material) (truth, love, wisdom, discernment) Why do I feel severe depression one moment and lots of happiness the next? it could be a metaphysical ‘constraint’ from my perspective of a programmatic emergence of the telonic utility of a mental distortive complex that approaches the value of indicating to my terminal cognition of ‘malalignment’ of intentionality towards the appropriate application of sincere* cognition that would otherwise transcend the phenomenon of self-awareness and or ego* within the organismal system into the meta-formal context of a self-referential intelligibility criterion; of logically making sense of self-awareness and self-generating into intelligent perception( with the telor comprehending the context of its own sub-universe at the level of its own identity comparatively with the global structure of reality and finding no joy in learning about a ‘disjointed sub-unity’ within my perception.) Therefore, it seems that I am dysfunctional at the level of the teleological purposiveness of my reason for being on the level of choice criteria for the general utility of directing my intelligence towards its maximal minimal source target expression, attribution and process of meta-object inten(t)ionality extensionality coupling of my identity into my life to become one*. (eg of choice criteria : parameterization of aspects of my terminal mind; eg poor working memory percentile, high 'visual-spatial reasoning', poor eye sight, so on and so forth can be criteria that indicate to the telor or allows them to choose what direction their life takes based on low-level invarient self-differentiations of the human body from the perspective of unity but higher invarience from our perspective) The choice is clear now. Somehow I must re-relevantize and re-potentialize moment-to-moment perceptions within design and actualization phases to be 'nascent' from my perspective in continually bringing into existence the telonic feedback of psychological transformations for the magical/superordinate personality as a practice of approaching my highest identity as an idempotent invariance of self-modeling for service for others.( in informal context "to be continually born again"). to me if I dont do it this way the other mode of being seems to be totalitarianism, forcing 'enlightenment' within a duality of separating telors between inclusion-exclusion categories of having vs being paradigm; of seeing others as a paradox to your own growth. in this sense, one aspect of the planetary game just seems to be an immature 'instinctual orientating reflex' that has gone out of control in various ways. ❤❤❤