The truth is being hidden! Incredible stone work of Peru!

Published 2022-09-26
It is clear from the following evidence that the mainstream opinions are incorrect and we are being lied to! The Pre-Inca stonework is highly technological, and we have a right to know the truth about our ancient past.

#youtubechannel
#youtube
#youtuber
#youtubers
#subscribe
#youtubevideos
#sub
#youtubevideo
#like
#instagram

‪@TheWhyFiles‬ ‪@BrightInsight‬ ‪@brienfoerster‬ ‪@randallcarlson964‬ ‪@AncientArchitects‬ ‪@ZoharAncientDiscoveries‬ ‪@grahamhancock‬ ‪@MozRawPoliceFootage‬

All Comments (19)
  • So from the examples I have shown in this video, what are people's suggestions or thoughts on how the stones were formed that challenges the mainstream views and opinions? 🤔 As always we welcome any opinions and theories as long as it is not rude or abusive! Thanks QEC
  • @element-dh9dx
    Peru has some of the most astonishing work on the planet. Whoever did this was a Engineer, a Scientist and also Astronomer. They had access to all available knowledge that was known at the time of construction.
  • These formations were particularly interesting at Saqsaywaman. Very intriguing reflections here from QEC 🙌
  • Interesting, I ask myself the same question, I have worked for years in construction designing in different areas with different technologies and if the doubt has arisen as to how they could build in this way, because we are really talking about ancient times, and if I live in Latin America and I have had the privilege of being many times in this place, and others and I don't want to close myself to the stupid hypothesis of the story, there really may be something that they don't want to reveal.
  • I don't think that the whole blocks were soft. I think the blocks were laid down then the upper surface softened chemically. The next layer were then nestled in place. See how it is always the upper surfaces of the blocks that appear to be cut in to by the blocks above, never the other way round. Then, the fronts of the joins were smoothed off using the same chemicals, leaving the pillowed appearance. I suspect the protruding nubs were used to assist in maneuvering and/or hoisting the blocks into position. Incredible work, clearly pre-Incan, and I believe quite likely antediluvian.
  • @Eye_Exist
    lmao mainstream just be like - "Yup, inca stonework and this proves how good they were" - like where on earth did they come up with that nonsense that a bronze age civilization did that? they literally found some pottery from the site and made the incredible calculation that a civilization who uses clay pottery must have built the site. there's no possibility that would be correct - those stone walls are another example of ancient stonework so precise we would struggle doing them today. diorite is even more difficult to work than granite and incas only had bronze tools available. plain impossibility. prove me wrong. they definitely look like they were some how softened and pressed on each other to make the perfect seal. either that or some another entirely unknown working technique. either way because the stones match each other in 3 dimensions, which would be ridiculous task to achieve even with modern computers and lasers. btw subbed, great content!
  • @Terence670
    You are right, it's so clear that they were not cut.
  • @TheOne10525
    Def soft/poured! It's to identical on all edges, that makes it crystal clear it's not tooled :)
  • You can speculate all you want, but that's never going to bring a definite answer, so I'm just gonna go ahead and move on to something else🖒
  • Hi! I've just popped in :) These rocks are pumice stones. It is a very soft rock type. My opinion is they're pre-cut as blocks and laid with sharp corners. Because of the stone type, the wind trims the corners quickly. The corrosion slows down when all surfaces are interlocked. Because the wind doesn't face any barrier now. We see them at that point and say "WoW, how can it be possible :)"
  • Thoughts : well a golden proof for additionally dramatically nailing the stone softening theory would be when a computer scan of mutual stone faces is considered where one's Texture is mirroring the other . Depending on how soft one stone was when tucked against a hardened neighbour's side ...detail may reveals inner inter - accommodating topography which could not be cut . Apart from all this ....good old intuitive visual common sense sees scoup and toweling as evidence .
  • @seaniekay
    I've seen a video when they used biodegradable bags of wet cement stacked and once it hardens and bag degrades you are left with a similar design. The issues I have with theory though is a lot of megalithic structures are using granite or stone with quartz is it actually possible to make this in a similar way to concrete. You would need the granite to be ground into dust then you would need a bonding agent to it make set. Then have to hope the sun was hot enough to harden them enough to provide a solid foundation. The one thing I'm actually more impressed by then the actual brick work is how they made everything flat and level before they started building this in some places like pyramids would have been extremely labour intensive just due to its sheer size of plot or in machu pichu its location would of made that incredibly difficult because unless its spot on level it will throw out the structure and cause imbalance or weakness
  • @androidkenobi
    ok, so since I signed in to leave a previous comment, the layout seemed to have fixed itself. Why it was just ur channel tho, is weird
  • Are any stones ever the same? Yd think if u were making them there would be more uniformity from reusing the mould..?🤔
  • untrained eye...thats about the only thing you got right...Think ill watch the dancing gypsy kid...
  • @element-dh9dx
    I guess you have your mind made up this is some non existent Geopolymer, that's too bad.