Pre-Historic Mega Structure Discovered In New Zealand: Kaimanawa Wall

926,023
0
Published 2024-03-10
According to conventional history, New Zealand is the last major landmass on Earth to be settled by humans. This distant island, located in the southwestern Pacific Ocean, remained uninhabited until the first Polynesians, the Māori, arrived around 1300 AD. However, a remarkable discovery was made on the North Island of New Zealand, one which can completely shatter our established understanding of the region's ancient history. Within the dense vegetation of the Kaimanawa Ranges lies a large megalithic structure known as the Kaimanawa Wall, a formation of stones so precisely fitted together that it has ignited a fervent debate about its origins, challenging our understanding of New Zealand's prehistoric past. The wall itself is characterized by a series of tightly fitted stones, which, at first glance, appear to have been placed with precision. The stones are massive, with some estimates suggesting that they weigh several tons each. It was determined that the stones were 330,000 years old and were made of ignimbrite, a volcanic stone made of compressed sand and ash. The nearest outcrop of such stone is 3 miles away or five kilometers. This aspect alone has fueled speculation about the level of sophistication required to assemble such a structure, should it have been the work of human hands. Upon closer examination, the arrangement of the stones reveals an almost geometric precision. The stones align in a manner that suggests an intentional pattern, with straight lines and angles that are uncommon in natural rock formations.

Join us in fueling our mission to create insightful videos backed by thorough research by supporting us on Patreon or PayPal:
patreon.com/universeinsideyou
paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=XSCP6D3HSBWEL
Your support can help us dive even deeper into topics that matter, enabling us to produce engaging content that informs and inspires. By contributing, you're not just backing a project – you're empowering a wealth of knowledge to be shared. Stand with us as we strive to bring meaningful videos to life. Every contribution counts.

Discover a world of creativity at our art and merchandise shop:
teespring.com/stores/universe...

Join us on:
Instagram: www.instagram.com/universe.inside.you
Facebook: www.facebook.com/universalloving

For Spanish-narrated videos, visit our Spanish channel:    / universe inside you español  


#universeinsideyou

All Comments (21)
  • I am Māori, I want to know what it is, how self absorbed are we to think we’re the first on this planet, there could have been 1000 civilisation before us our planet is that old.
  • @BioTransXX
    As a Māori I want to know the history of the ancients that used to live in New Zealand as much as I want to know about the ancients who lived in other places as well. Ancients living in NZ before the Maori does not take away the indigenous identity of the Māori who lived in NZ for at least 1000 years before the arrival of the Brits. But whenever solid evidence appears of earlier people groups occupying the land, we should know about it. The ancient history of the world belongs to humanity, not a single people group or country.
  • @JustPlayItCool
    Ha! I grew up in Silverdale. Lived in the far background at 21:23 of the video. Had ocean views from my bedroom window. Was a great place to grow up!
  • @bartelgrant
    Clickbait thumbnail nowhere to be seen in the video. Misleading.
  • @Truthseeker55182
    Wow this is being dismissed because it goes against the historical narrative of New Zealand?!!! It’s so infuriating that we dismiss and disregard our ancient ancestors because we fear our true history.
  • @matt4sure364
    Maori oral history speaks of the "redheaded tall ones" that were here before them, also know as the tanga te whenua. They taught them how to grow kumara, the only crops grown by maori before the Europeans arrived.
  • @samgraham8430
    Your thumbnail undermines their whole presentation.
  • @nkcjulie
    I was getting an "Erich von Däniken" vibe all through this video.
  • I just love how mainstream academic scholars are always quick to dismiss these ideas, It goes against the grain of their very foundations and would make fools and laughing stocks out of all them, their peer review papers and books would be forever removed from history. This is why we will never see the truth presented by anyone other than people considered fringe. What the world recognizes as truth has become the biggest lie of all.
  • @Amber-hm3cp
    Finally! I’ve been waiting for someone to start talking about this. Skeletons in the cupboard is a nz doco series that talks about this and more that’s been found and isn’t talked about here.
  • @rdea4158
    Really good presentation, very enjoyable. Note per NZ Herald: this was Debunked in 1996 by Department of Conservation regional archaeologist Neville Ritchie “They carefully dug a trench along the front of the wall that allowed them to track the face of the stone deep into the ground. Two metres down it merged with the bedrock. The huge blocks belonged where they stood, and had not been shifted or shaped by humans.” The wall was part of a large ignimbrite outcrop. After the volcanic rock flowed into place about 330,000 years ago, it cooled and cracked, leaving the appearance of a stone wall. In his DoC report, Ritchie said the presence of a long horizontal crack along the length of the visible outcrop added to its man-made appearance but further into the hill, it was less uniform and several other features - such as natural layers in the rock matched from one block to the next, meaning it had started as one piece. Barry Brailsford also accepted Ritchie’s findings, detailing the whole episode in his 2019 autobiography Beyond the Boundaries of Time.
  • It is a natural rock formation. The regular block shapes are produced by natural fractures in the rock.
  • @mnag3046
    We have to start asking why all these mega structures were built all over the world pre younger Dryas and all built in the same way with a connection to astrology, it’s no longer a coincidence
  • @natec6538
    Like Agent Scully, they want it to be true, so bad! Sensational presentation of scant evidence. Why did I click on this!
  • @mats8375
    I saw a documentary when a megalithic structure was inspected. It was created by very large rocks (sometimes 20 tons or more) cut into rectangular shapes and connected without mortar with very precise cutting to make them fit each other. There was also a visible later reconstruction effort. The original structure was expanded with much smaller rocks connected with mortar. The researchers said that it's significant drop in quality, but I have an alternative explanation. I think it was a sign of improvement. Big rock buildings can stand for ages, but they are good when you have a lot of time and population stable for centuries. You don't need to build new homes, unless the old collapse when the population is flat. You can take your time hauling 200 ton rocks uphill. But when there is advancement in agriculture, and population rises, you need some quicker method. Small stones and mortar would suffice. There is also less builders available, because people tend to land or engage in craftsmanship or trade. Maybe it was a sign of progress? When people for the first time saw that future is not a flat line and maybe there is no need to build for eternity.
  • @jasonkiwi4758
    A very well researched and put together presentation. I am from NZ and have heard many stories from elders of who was here first,. and it was not Maori.
  • @David-jk2dp
    The pre flood civilization might as well be called Atlantean. So much evidence presents that it was world wide and not simply localized in one place now considered hidden or lost
  • @pabloherman8836
    How difficult is it to create a thumbnail that is not a lie? Must be pretty tough.