Why Are T 90 Tanks Losing the War in Ukraine

414,550

3,882 3,316

2024-03-08に共有

The T90, built on the bones of the T-72, inherited some of its older sibling's design flaw: storing ammunition alongside the crew in the turret's carousel autoloader. This contrasts with Western tanks, where shells reside in safer, separate compartments. This seemingly minor detail creates a deadly vulnerability.

Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

コメント (21)

@CreatorSheva 4ヶ月前

No matter how formidable a tank, any tank, it is easily destroyed by drones, and very often the first time.
@No_Ne684 4ヶ月前

If we put any other tank in place of the T-90, we would obtain the same observation. The weapon that is the tank is no longer such a decisive weapon in a contemporary conflict context where drones, anti-tank weapons and satellites are omnipresent. The only difference is that the Russians have more tanks than the others.
@watcher5729 4ヶ月前

why are all tanks losing the war makes more sense.Drones ISR targeting help ATGMS.looks like unmanned smaller means more effective in the future in silent swarm electric drive
@hapemokenela7388 4ヶ月前

I'm pretty sure the Russian T-90 tanks are not "losing the war in Ukraine"
@combinedlegacy 4ヶ月前

You can make "trendy and click bait" titles but we know the truth. The T-90 was barely deployed until recently. The T-72 was the most prominent tank at the onset. Dont give me this bs video. Challenger, leopard, abrams and all other tanks failed the same. This channel is starting to suck.
@nikolastijelja9796 4ヶ月前

Every tank can burn . No matter eastern or western . It is foolish to think they are indestructible. Low profile, good chassis or safe ammo compartment...all that is nothing if AP shell is fired . Even a single , old rpg7 can be dangerous
@GaryBonnell-tl1jp 3ヶ月前

They are not losing they have the best ejecting turrets in this war doesn't anyone realize these are highly trained cosmaunauts manning these machines
@user-qv2pi7hk5c 4ヶ月前

Just remember our challengers didn’t fair well neither did any western equipments
@diegoflores9237 4ヶ月前

Russia is taking Ukrainian fortified positions and you say Russia is losing? You need to stop coping
@luisb.benitez8192 4ヶ月前

Let's do a little math. Today marks 744 days since the start of the war. According to this video, 57 T90s have already been lost, which gives an average of 1 tank every 13.05 days on a front of more than 1000 km. The invasion of Iraq occurred between March 20 and May 1, 2003, it lasted 44 days and they lost 31 Abrams which means 1 Abrams lost every 1, 31 days....the Iraqis did not have Javelin, no mines, no drones, they were not trained by NATO, did they have not Starlink, ect, ect, ect......🤔🤔🤔😂😂😂
@dreist43 4ヶ月前

In two years of war, 57 tanks is almost nothing…
@ryszardrakowski2711 4ヶ月前

Recently there was a rare tank-on-tank encounter between Abrams and T-72 B3M. Old Soviet tank dispatched American marvel of technology with one shot.
@michelpozo4656 4ヶ月前

Yesterday Abrams M1 fired by T72 🤡
@Kosackk 4ヶ月前

Did you get paid to make a 180°? What happend to u?
@loganschmidt-if6db 4ヶ月前

Could you do a video on the Agm 86 vs Kh 55
@user-yy9hk9od9u 4ヶ月前

Drones have become dominant. Main battle tanks and attack helicopters are becoming too costly and less relevant.
@NzTings 4ヶ月前

Not going to mention how a t72 just 1 hit an Abrams? 😂😂
@nestorkosmoi8841 4ヶ月前

Losing the war is a bit exaggerated, or does the term losing in Ukrainian mean winning? that would explain a lot 😂
@lonewolfmape9275 1ヶ月前

Attack drones are cheaper than T-90 tanks
@Urai70 4ヶ月前

Ah! yes... the Challenger, Leopard and M1 Abrams have been a real game changer.. indestructible and invincible with their perfect design and top tier protection system..... while every Russian equipment is riddled with flaws and weaknesses