Why Prusa is the next Blackberry

352,391
764
Publicado 2024-03-22
Use code SHOPNATION50 to get 50% OFF First Box and free wellness shots for life with any active subscription at bit.ly/49QcvG9
Shop Organization & Dust Collection: www.shopnationstore.com

I love Prusa...which is why I'm hard on them. I don't want them to slip into obsolescence! What do you think Prusa needs to do to stay on top?

You cannot go wrong with any of these 3D printers:
Prusa XL (single tool head) - bit.ly/3PVzBn1
Prusa XL (5 tool head) - bit.ly/3TBP9gK
Bambulab P1P - bit.ly/3O2SLFy
Bambulab P1S - bit.ly/44D99Ub
Bambulab X1C - bit.ly/450GVCV
Prusa mk4 - bit.ly/3rKcLpm

Product Design Online (Learn 3D Modeling) - bit.ly/3JgNPLR

Shop Nation Links:
----------------------------------------------------
Shop Nation Website: www.shopnationstore.com
Instagram (@dreamshopnation): www.instagram.com/dreamshopnation
Thangs Support Community: than.gs/u/1284339

This video is sponsored by Factor

Todos los comentarios (21)
  • @ShopNation
    Thanks for watching! What do you think? Use code SHOPNATION50 to get 50% OFF First Box and free wellness shots for life with any active subscription at bit.ly/49QcvG9
  • @ndisa4444
    The one thing Prusa still will hang on to over nearly every other major printer company is their EU manufacturing. It doesn't matter to most people, but it does for some. Personally I appreciate seeing Prusa stay true to its roots and move even more of its manufacturing to the Czech Republic. Its not enough to be the sole reason I would choose Prusa, but it is good to see.
  • @jamescollier2049
    Multicolor isn’t the main use case for the multi head system I believe. I work in prototyping and research and this printer would be extremely useful for multi-material type parts. For example, we print in one material for the part and we print the supports in dissolvable material.
  • @sschueller
    Here is what I want to see from prusia: a smaller xl, fully enclosed, heated chamber, air filtration, dual head (either tool swapping or fixed) that's it. Can still cost more than others but at least I get the same features.
  • @peter9011
    Definitely forgot to mention the best thing about this printer, it’s the fact you can print tpu with pla supports with a petg body, something you litterally couldn’t do with a x1c
  • @ndisa44
    I think the first problem with the XL is that it has been widely accepted as a Bambu AMS competitor, when I think it is more accurate to compare it to something like the E3D toolchanger. The toolchanger was a similar price to the XL, and it could that price because there was nothing else with the same capability. That said, the E3D Toolchanger was also just a motion system, not a ready to use printer.
  • @eida-am
    You have forgotten an important point: When it comes to multi-material prints, it makes a big difference whether the material comes from one hot end or from different ones. If it comes from one hot end, layer adhesions in the Z-plane of the material change are much worse (even if a lot of purging is done). This does not happen with a printer like the Prusa XL or IDEX printers. This has an enormous influence on the strength of a component. This means that the target group is not so small, but is aimed at all people who want to print multi-materials and have certain strength requirements.
  • I believe Prusa is doing a slow, but steady pivot to a B2B model, which would show why they are lagging in the consumer market. Businesses with privacy concerns don't like Bambu spyware sending their gcode, and a european company is something that will offer better support than a chinese one. You can see it with their Prusa Lab videos, they're all highlights of how they are making big moves in the B2B space, replacing what Ultimaker used to be, but catching up at the consumer/prosumer market much more slowly.
  • @GregorOttmann
    If Prusa brought out a fully enclosed tool changer with active chamber heating and linear motors, I would throw my money at them way faster than Josef could catch it.
  • Still waiting for a company to come out with a way to reuse all the wasted filament without having to build my own version.
  • @Paul-rs4gd
    I really want Prusa to win. The company has customer support beyond any other company that I have dealt with. Their open source philosophy has pushed 3D printing forward and benefited the whole community.
  • The Bambu experience is absolutely amazing… until you need product support. Once that happens, you will remember why you loved Prusa so much.
  • @Brosion99
    i think the XL can be a gamechanger if they implement software that allows for different size nozzles to print one and the same object. Infill and supports will be done with a 0.8mm nozzle, low detail areas on the outside will also be done in 0.8 or 0.6 mm and the high detail areas will be done with 0.4 or even 0.2 mm, possibly even going down to 0.1mm layer hight to ensure great details while the infill etc. gets added at 0.3mm every third layer or maybe even 0.6mm every sixth layer. This would result in huge prints with incredible details, like when printed with a 0.2mm nozzle alone, but in a fraction of the time. Might be a big gamechanger for professionals who are selling detailed prints. Also They might be able to add different types of tools that could pick up and insert magnets or similar items into the prints allowing a kind of automatic assembly of mechanical parts into the printed object. The possibilities are quite limitless if you start to think about it.
  • @PoliteChihuahua
    I changed my ringtone to the modem dial-up sound and I either get a WTF look or a giggle.
  • @aj_mcnamara
    The XL was not a response to Bambuu. Prusa announced it before Bambuu launched their X1 campaign.
  • @my1987toyota
    Where I work I use the Prusa mini and Bambu Carbon with the AMS. The Bambu is fast and precise and the AMS takes some of the worry off of running out of filament half way through a large print. It's ability to handle higher temps and or more exotic filaments is fantastic. The Prusa mini is smaller, slower, quieter and generally reliable. Plus you don't normally need a glue stick for most prints. What I feel should be stressed more then it is , is the fact that the Prusa being open source means you don't have to worry about what you already OWN and paid for suddenly being put behind a subscription pay wall. The Bambu on the other hand has all the elements already in place for that to happen. When your machine is purposely made to favor having an internet connection over anything else says alot to me. The Bambu is nice but I will always look on it with an eye of suspicion expecting for that to happen. Too many other companies have done just that with their products.
  • @UncleJessy
    Fantastic breakdown. I love the heck out of my single tool head Prusa XL but it is really dang hard to recommend with other printer options that are out there for a fraction of the price.
  • @amarug
    Been in the 3D printing business since 2011 starting with the Ultimaker original. Over time I grew less and less interested in the printers and more just interested in the output and dreamed of a hands-off experience. Last year I bought the Bambu P1S for my work and it's a total game changer. I can't overstate how happy I am with it, just push the button and collect your parts later, never had a fail.
  • @Azrael56
    Smaller XL with 3 heads: 2 for different colours and 1 for dissolvable support for exemple.
  • @AngryApple
    The thing with Bambu Labs Printers are that they also look good and fit in an normal office room, the prusa machines with the orange and stuff screams "nerd" all over it.