Why Jesus Is The Only Way To Heaven

did you just explain 2000 years of religion in a 3 minute minecraft video

As a fellow christion I agree with the stuff said in the first 5 seconds

I agreed with most of the video, but you should look into Orthodox Christianity. Christ says in Matthew 16 about a church which "even the gates of hades" won't prevail, so it's Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox or Roman Catholic. And from there, a little but of church history will get you to Holy Orthodoxy. But good video bro, we should spread Jesus to everyone.

Brave for putting the most brutal verses of the Qu'ran. Hopefully they don't stone you.

Love your video but the only problem/misconception is that in the Trinity no one has a higher role than the other is just that us Christians see it that way but the Bible refers to them as the Godhead in which three of them are distinct people with distinct roles but still one person. I feel like the best example of this is through the human body. The Bible said that humans were created in His image therefore it can be assumed that he principle of the Godhead was created in us as the Body, Soul and Spirit

Elichu, watch Sam Shamoun another brother in Christ. His channel is shamounian. Good point as well.

Amen bro keep going God is using you

I agree everything what you said, and i wanna talk more with you and share understanding together and more that is Very, Very Important

Also one of the fun facts of the Bible is that the Bible doesn't preach that there is only one God, the Bible preaches that there may be many gods but there is only one true God that you should worship.

what happened to the old smp content?

I like this change on content. Keep it up

The problem in believing in any god is that this all mighty god that can do anything let's hate and horrifying things happens to people that did nothing wrong makes you think if there is a god. I don't think that the Bible should be looked as a holy book or a religious text but to be studied as a philosophy point of view on things such as good and evil. Plus there isn't really a lot of historical evidence that hold that biblical events have happened. Am i right of saying of you shouldn't believe in your faith, no, are you in the right of saying that other religions are wrong no, with other words i suggest to let people believe in what they want, don't try to disprove others views of there own life and just live your own. Because we will never truly know if there is an other side. We only live, don't make it hard for other people or your self .

I need citations and papers for external validation of your beliefs besides your unproven axioms

whelp this is going to take a while: On your claims about Islam: Islamic people do not believe that Jesus will come back so your argument doesn't work. Mohamed is the messenger of god not their leader or god so what he does is irrelevant to the religion. Allah is the greatest deceiver because he is god and thus perfect and to be perfect one must be the best at everything that includes deception also what the greatest deceiver is in the bible is irrelevant(also it still has to be god since god is perfect). The Torra isn't the bible. On your claims about Judaism: No those lines doesn't say that Jesuses is good it just says that their will be a unspecified savor. In Judaism their is no concept of a holy trinity their is just god and god is all powerful so he can be a spirt but the line you refer to is using the word spirt as a different word for essence. On your claims about buddism: Yes and no some branches of Buddhism claim their is no god or that they don't know that their is god and nirvana is a state of true happiness as that is what the buddha strove to find other forms of Buddhism will claim a hindu system of gods (multiple levels of existence the higher planes being kind of like deity's and god or brahmin being everything) and that nirvana is both achieving a state of true happiness and breaking free from the cycle of rebirth. Google god of the gaps argument and counterarguments while with a google search you will find people who are better than me at debunking it I'll still make some arguments because its fun, gravity is different on every plant so with an infinite amount of time to make planets and destroy them and resources that never disappear (law of mass conservation) is it not logical to assume that at some point in time the perfect form of gravity for life to exist will appear? Well I don't know is a perfectly good answer to how do you get life from no life? But claiming because you don't know that it must be god is flawed as a few hundred years ago we didn't know how gravity worked or what it is yet we now no what it is and how it works and it isn't god. No Buddhist don't believe Jesus was a Buddhist for the reason you brought up. On your claims on Hinduism: Hinduism believe that god is everything this is different from the monotheistic view so your claim about the painter and painting is illogical. Your claim that Hinduism isn't true is because the bible said so this isn't really an argument as you then would have to prove that the bible is true. On you claim about the bible being true: So what that their are a lot of versions of the bible that doesn't make it any truer e.g their are a lot of versions of harry potter that doesn't make it real. Give me a historical record from a reliable source that 500 people witnessed Jesus being resurrected and that 500 people witnessed it (the bible is not a reliable source as the people who made it would have the motive to lie for power) give me an example of its accuracy I can give you an example where it is wrong: The world was not created in 7 days as rocks half-life's show that it had to exists for millions of years, evolution is a thing which mean that at very least god did not directly created every animal and humans, the entire of Israeli where never enslaved by the Egyptians as many biblical scholars and historians agree that it never happened and you can look at the evidence they provide, their was never a flooding of the entire earth since billions of years ago. How does the 10 names prove anything? Now for some arguments against god (again their are better people at arguing against god online but I'll state some arguments here because I its fun): Problem of evil by the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus: p1 God is defined as all-knowing all loving and all-powerful p2 An all loving being would stop evil if it could p3 Evil exists __________________________________________________________ Therefor god does not exist to add to this argument the most common counter argument you will see is: Evil exist because of free will however this is flawed to be all knowing you have to be able to see the future and if you can see the future their must be one predetermined path that will happen therefore you do not have free will as what will happen is destined to happen. If evil didn't exist we wouldn't know what good and thus can't be happy is however this is also flawed as even the bible disputes this argument as in genesis Adam and Eve do not know what evil and good is and yet the are content in their paradise without the knowledge of evil or good their is no suffering as suffering only exists if you are aware it exists it is something only in the mind but hippieness is an emotion something you can feel regardless if you know what it is or not. Some argument would be that being all-powerful is contradictory as can god create a rock that nothing will ever be able to lift no mater what if he can't he isn't all-powerful but if he can then he can't lift up the rock and therefor isn't all powerful. Being all knowing and all powerful is also contradictory as the same rationality that humans don't have free will and that everything is predetermined also applies to him but if the future is predestined he can't be all powerful as he can't change the future. Their is also a problem that applies more directly to Christianity which is why would an all knowing god write two book instead of just one.

All religions lead to Heaven. Think of those born BEFORE Jesus appeared on the Earth. See? Common sense. Blessings

Buddhism believes in the law of nature. It states that the world or universe has rules. These do not have to be enforced by a god. Also the bible doesn´t come close to any sort of accuracy. There is a laundry list of false statements or beliefs shown in the bible. I assume you are protestant or believe in a branch of Protestantism because you don´t mention the catholic church so i won´t rant about them. But the bible is definitely not accurate in most regards let alone completely correct. In all other matters discussed here I´m not knowledgeable enough to comment on so I won´t try to dispute your claims on Islam, Hindu, etc. But what do I know, I´m agnostic anyways.

great video man!

First of all, i respect your religion entirely, and i love your appreciation of islam, but let me refute all of your points here against it, i wanna keep it civil with no argument between us, just a mature discussion first of all in verse 4:34 its explained by tafsir that it means to strike them gently, meaning that if your wife is disobedient just strike them gently, because its haram to hit your wife, or slap her, here is all the proof you need that islam treats women fairly, and not a "misogynistic" religion as many people believe: The Quran enjoins good treatment of one's wife: she is to be honoured and treated kindly, even when one no longer feels love in one's heart towards her. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “and live with them honourably. If you dislike them, it may be that you dislike a thing and Allah brings through it a great deal of good.” [al-Nisa 4:19] The Quran explains that women have rights over their husbands , just as their husbands have rights over them. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And they (women) have rights (over their husbands as regards living expenses) similar (to those of their husbands) over them (as regards obedience and respect) to what is reasonable, but men have a degree (of responsibility) over them. And Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise” [al-Baqarah 2:228] The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) enjoined kind treatment and honouring of one’s wife, and he described the best of people as those who are best to their wives. He said: “The best of you are those who are the best to their wives, and I am the best of you to my wives.” (Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 3895; Ibn Majah, 1977; classed as sahih by al-Albani in Sahih al-Tirmidhi) The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “Fear Allah with regard to women, for you have taken them as a trust from Allah and intimacy with them has become permissible to you by the words of Allah. Your right over them is that they should not allow anyone to sit on your furniture whom you dislike; if they do that then hit them but not in a harsh manner. And their right over you is that you should provide for them and clothe them on a reasonable basis.” Narrated by Muslim, 1218. What is meant by “they should not allow anyone to sit on your furniture whom you dislike” is that they should not allow anyone whom you dislike to enter your houses, whether the person disliked is a man or a woman, or any of the woman’s mahrams [close relatives to whom marriage is forbidden]. The prohibition includes all of them. (From the words of al-Nawawi) Sorry for the long speech, but i just wanted to prove to you that islam isnt as you view it And about prophet muhammad commiting a sin, i found this answer on quora, hope it helps No. Not only Muhammad, but the overall position of the Quran is prophets (any prophet) cannot make any grave sin. When a company gains a large profit in a year, it often gives an extra bonus to its employees as a token of thanks for their efforts and to encourage them further. Similarly during the prophet’s life, when he and his companions gained victory they got special bonus from their lord. And the reward was the declaration higher chance of acceptance of repentance of the whole team, on that occasion. Not always the winning of battles were considered as a victory but a good treaty (that put Muslims in a good diplomatic position), acceptance of Islam by other people etc were also considered as victories since these are the achievement the whole team earned by their effort and life. For example: Example 1: In Chapter 48 (the name of the chapter is a “Victory”), forgiveness was proclaimed in verse 2 for their achievement of the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah. Example 2: In Chapter 110 (the name of the chapter is “Help”), it was told to ask forgiveness or repent to God (verse 3) that could be given on the occasion of people embracing Islam in crowds (verse 1–2). Example 3: In Quran 9:27 (the name of the chapter is “Repentance”), forgiveness is again hinted just after talking about their efforts in battle in the previous verse (9:25–26), though they lacked in it and needed the help from angels. Example 4: Quran 3:146–148 describes none specifically that the companions of previous prophets (who struggled with the prophet) also got forgiveness for their effort. Now coming back to your question. 48:1 Truly, We have granted you (singular) a clear victor 48:2 so that God may forgive you (singular) your past and future sins and complete His favour to you and guide you to a straight path 48:2 is not talking about the forgiveness of sin of prophet Muhammad but the whole team. The reason that it is mentioned as singular you, the whole team took a pledge under the hand of prophet Muhammad during a very tense situation. It is described in a very powerful verse. 48:10 Behold, all who pledge their allegiance to you indeed pledge their allegiance to God: the hand of God is over their hands. Hence, he who breaks his oath, breaks it only to his own loss. Whereas he who remains true to what he has pledged to God, shall have a great reward bestowed upon him by God. 48:18 God was pleased with the believers when they swore allegiance to you [Prophet] under the tree: He knew what was in their hearts and so He sent tranquillity down to them and rewarded them with a victory near at hand. During this incident, the treaty of Hudaybiyyah was signed between Muslims and Meccans. The conditions of the treaty were highly insulting for the Muslims and the companions didn’t agree with it. But prophet compromised and signed to make peace. This step of prophet toward peace later contributed a lot to the overall spread of the new faith. Thats why the treaty is considered as victory and God denoted the victory to the team leader (the prophet) in verse 1 above with singular you and the forgiveness (meaning: the higher chance of accepting the repentance similarly which is proclaimed in example 2 above) of sin of the whole team with the singular you since they all pledged their allegiance to God under one hand. Who then had broken this allegiance lost their golden chance (48:10 above) of acceptance of repentance from their past and future sins (48:2)! Two Surah before (according to the order of revealation), it was promised for the whole team (look at the plural “all who believe) where this victory (name of chapter 48, mentioning the treaty) was foretold. And as the team leader prophet was told to convey this good news to all the believers. You are to believe in God and His Apostle, and to strive hard in Gods cause with your possessions and your lives: this is for your own good - if you but knew it! [If you do so,] He will forgive you your sins, and [in the life to come] will admit you into gardens…! And [withal, He will grant you] yet another thing that you dearly love: succour from God [in this world], and a victory soon to come: and [thereof, O Prophet,] give thou a glad tiding to all who believe. (Quran 61:11–13). Note 1: Themes of the chapters of Quran follow cyclic structure. Note 2: There are other verse (such as 10:94), where singular “you” meant the whole group. I hope that answers your questions on islam, just please research carefully next time

Buddhism isn't a philosophy or whatever, it's a religion. The fact that it doesn't have a "God" in the Christian sense can't be a proof of its invalidity because Buddhism is not correlated to Christianity and thus to the Christian understanding of the divine. Buddhists believe the world has to be like this, it's necessary. As you have said, if some things were to change then the whole universe would collapse. But Buddhism doesn't say that what the universe is today is just a result of casualty. Plus you can't say Hinduism is wrong because the Bible says so. You could say that the Vedas prove that the Christian God isn't real and that's enough evidence for such a claim; now, you'll obviously notice how dumb this argument is.

Psalm 23:1–6 1 The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want. 2 He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters. 3 He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name’s sake. 4 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me. 5 Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over. 6 Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever.