Heidegger: Prophet of Being and Destroyer of Metaphysics?
3,401
2023-11-19に共有
I’m a free philosopher. It is your generous contributions that make my work possible. Huge thanks to all my supporters!
Support me via PayPal: www.paypal.com/paypalme/janiederhauser
Enrol in one of my courses here halkyonacademy.teachable.com/
My Substack: halkyon.substack.com/
Patreon: www.patreon.com/classicalphilosophy?fan_landing=tr…
Gift Bitcoin: 3JimXYdoLVPWVEtk3tPtiYcLqQsFmS5KmH
Copyright: Johannes Achill Niederhauser
コメント (15)
-
I am slowly approaching Heidegger. First, I must master Husserl as much as I can. I am very interested in Heidegger’s writings on Aristotle.
-
Many people tried to destroy metaphysics. They all still ended up with a priori claims about Forms. Plato remains undefeated.
-
Check out a paper Heidegger on the History of Machination: Oblivion of Being as Degradation of Wonder by Mikko Joronen
-
Cant wait 😫😘
-
Thanks!
-
Do you think it is essential to read Heideeger in German or would you say that his thought can be encapculated in English translations?
-
I guess we all can sense what hides or stands behind our artificial I-ness, and that is totally impersonal, That, un-namable and unchangeable, and is one for everyone. It is also good that Metaphysics is disappearing. With it, our unnecessary I-ness also disappears.
-
I’m onto Beyung via Heidegger but I’m not abdicating western metaphysics or eastern theology for any German philosopher no matter how big his BEING Energy is. I love Heidegger but he’s not the only person who thinks, or has thought or will be thinking in the future. He was a herald of the coming of Technological Age but he was a false prophet of post gods or God zeitgeist .
-
18:21 very helpful Very helpful. Especially for my current focus on the unsayable as central for all thinking. Please can you give a page number for the quote on oblivion / Seinsvergessenheit
-
Prophet and shepherd...
-
I am able to reclaim my das sein because of Heidegger.
-
Anything post-Heidegger that isn’t Heideggerian is useless
-
But isn't This in its essence very christian, the approach of the unavailable? And it's the approach of this unavailable or unavailable in the imminent precisely the thing that both we must approach but can't approach? Or the beauty that sustains being which is the helious or the sun coming into the subjectivity of time and this is the central argument of hegel is it not?
-
What a coincidence! I was reading Jorden Peterson's book on his 12 rules, and he mentioned the Being 👍