Trump seeks to set aside New York verdict hours after Supreme Court ruling

65,968
0
Published 2024-07-02

All Comments (21)
  • Remember that "Fifth Avenue" comment ? Seems to work everywhere.
  • @TheNixzilla
    Most of these comments let me know that the avg person has no fucking idea who caused what during their presidency.
  • @Bluesit32
    Hah! Last I checked, these occurred prior to being president.
  • @GoUtes92
    Didn't the court already explain what the extent of his immunity is? Lol. I'm pretty sure the New York case doesn't qualify. He wasn't president at the time.
  • @bloodbp
    the hush money payments happened before he was elected. how will they argue he had immunity back then?
  • @richdobbs6595
    This sounds like a case of correlation is not causation. You didn't share the the details of the motion. Is it even related to the immunity ruling?
  • @melendjam
    If the President has the ability to pardon clearly he is above the law. If the President has the authority to authorize clandestine operations, he is clearly above the law. What's BS is when you have Judges that know better bending the rules to their liking.
  • @4125131236323
    is he trying to claim that his coverup payments to a porn star and his attempt to cover up those payments when he was NOT president is somehow an "official presidential act?"?
  • @mountbara
    Acting like the appeal was not already in the works is disengeuous.
  • @greenleaf2233
    a bribe is a bribe is a bribe is a bribe is a bribe....I felt good typing that...
  • They better not stand for it this trial is over he gets what he deservrs.
  • @Andy-bl8gg
    If he even did that, if, it wasn't illegal in the first place. They didn't want to go after him till they were pressured which you can't do legally anyways. Plus it was supposedly to cover a crime that they never even specified. All the cases are weak and they have no history of going after anyone else for similar or worse. I doubt they have plans to go after anyone else for similar reasons. And they changed rules and laws just for these cases and did things different, didn't allow certain things, just for these cases. And the timing. You just can't do that. It happens but lady justice is supposed to be blind. So at this point to us it might . matter but legally it's irrelevant if he did these things or not because you can't target people in different ways. It happens a lot but it's illegal.