Michio Kaku is IN CONTROL! (361)

106,694
0
Published 2023-10-27
Please join my mailing list here 👉 briankeating.com/list to win a meteorite 💥

There is a God equation in mathematics; could there be a God equation in physics? Is Michio Kaku back in control 😂
This is the question to which Dr. Michio Kaku has dedicated his life. Dr. Kaku is a theoretical physicist, bestselling author, acclaimed public speaker, renowned futurist, and popularizer of science. As co-founder of String Field Theory, Dr. Kaku carries on Einstein’s quest to unite the four fundamental forces of nature into a single grand unified theory.

In this repost episode of Into the Impossible from 2021, Dr. Kaku and I embark on a quest to find this theory of everything. We discuss artificial intelligence, string theory, God, agnosticism, how to become the next Einstein and one of my favorite books – The God Equation.

Tune in!

Join this channel to get access to perks:
youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join

Intro (00:00)
Could an advanced AI create a game like chess? (02:08)
Balancing fame with physics (04:17)
Has particle physics been dormant for the last 50 years? (08:16)
Rivals to the string theory (17:48)
Different laws for different universes (24:46)
Is string theory falsifiable? (30:18)
What agnosticism means to Michio (37:50)
Is there a step before a grand unified theory? (40:35)
What connects the string theory to God? (43:09)
Michio’s parents were interned during WWII (46:23)
Outro (53:00)

—

Additional resources:

📚 The God Equation by Michio Kaku: a.co/d/bo4MDC2

📺 Watch my most popular videos:
Neil Turok    • Why Neil Turok Believes Physics Is In...  
Frank Wilczek    • Nobel Prizewinner Frank Wilczek: Beau...  
Eric Weinstein vs. Stephen Wolfram    • Stephen Wolfram vs. Eric Weinstein: M...  
Sir Roger Penrose:    • Nobel Prize in Physics, Black Holes a...  
Sabine Hossenfelder:    • “I Don’t Care About Your Theory of Ev...  
Avi Loeb:    • UFOs & UAPs: The Situation Has Change...  

➡️ Follow me on your fav platforms:
✖️ Twitter: twitter.com/DrBrianKeating
🔔 YouTube: youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1
📝 Join my mailing list: briankeating.com/mailing_list
✍️ Check out my blog: briankeating.com/blog.php
🎙️ Follow my podcast: briankeating.com/podcast

Into the Impossible with Brian Keating is a podcast dedicated to all those who want to explore the universe within and beyond the known.

Make sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode!

#intotheimpossible #briankeating #michiokaku

~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Please watch: "Neil DeGrasse Tyson: Plays the Race Card!"
   • Neil DeGrasse Tyson Hit Me With the R...  
~-~~-

All Comments (20)
  • @himanshu36010
    Kaku can win nobel prize in comedy, guy is hilarious af
  • @frankicon9521
    Please get Michio Kaku and Eric Weinstein in one discussion.
  • @daffidavit
    In 1972 I was a sophomore at FIT in Melbourne Fl. All students, even those who studied economics,. were required to take a year of chemistry, physics, and different fields of math. But at no time were we ever exposed to particle physics. The closest we came was chemistry. I despised physics during those years, but learned to love it many years later on an amature level after reading books by Hawking, Kaku, Greene, Susskind and the like. Interviews like this are worth their weight in gold, IMHO.
  • @dougsie8791
    Sometimes I wish we could find a perfect internet theory to end poor streaming quality.
  • @henryjfischer
    Michiu Kaku often speaks aimlessly. That diatribe about wolf pecking orders did not contribute anything to his conclusion about how far we are from artificial general intelligence.
  • @gaetonzorzi9595
    I’m really starting to question the sanity of both these guys
  • @user-qs4fc3uj3g
    not that my opinion matters to the good doctor but i would like to formally apologize to Dr Kaku. I can't really pinpoint where I acquired this opinion but I thought he was more of a popularizer and youtube scientist than a practicing, cutting edge physicist. btw I think being the former is a huge bonus to mankind so I never thought that was a bad thing. I hit ~22 min in and realized Michio is right there with all the brilliant physicists/mathematicians I listen to incessantly and comprehend sporadically :) Thanks Dr Kaku and Prof Brian.
  • @JURSSICZ
    Oh look another REUPLOAD. Very misleading Brian, your channel will never grow this way, you're getting terrible advice if you think so. If you reupload make sure to mention it's a reupload and put the original date in the title.
  • @d0ubtingThom4s
    Sadly, just because a dude tries his hardest to look like Einstein does not make him the next Einstein
  • So Michio's response to the criticisms of string theory is basically "Haters are just jealous" lol
  • @sidhuggins9387
    He is working on a problem that hasn't had a solution in over 70 years ... they still don't have it.
  • The thumbnail is just good trolling.Well done Dr Keating 😅😂😂
  • @RWin-fp5jn
    Michio is ok. And Michio’s string theory in itself isn’t a bad idea. He is 100% correct that elementary particles are NOT to be seen as little erratic moving biljart balls, but excitations of one and the same omnipresent field, where the different orthogonal modes they can vibrate in, determining their classification. Where string theory DOES next lose the plot is that such vibrational distortions can’t be actually cut-off from the fabric as ‘loose’ objects. A Universal equilibrium always requires connectivity to the all-engulfing spacetime fabric, that Einstein called ‘aether’ in his 1920 `Leiden lecture’ closing words. I urge anyone to read these closing words. Only if attached, can orthogonal vibrations, cause longitudinal contractions in the same fabric, which o surprise is what causes gravity in the first place. As such, the true theory of gravity is Einstein special relativity where speed causes vibrations in the fabric it moves in, contracting frontal space and time, which is wrapped in a standing wave of orthogonal ‘quanta’ of windings around the speeding object thus ‘giving it’ extra mass (inverse time) and energy (inverse space). This is why space and time are not each others ‘equivalent’ and neither are energy and mass (Penrose got that right!). We don’t NEED a ToE, as we already have one. For 100 years we were told not to look under our feet. Is suggest we do and start applying it if we want to become a spacefaring species…
  • If he is Einstein then Forest Gump is the next Nikola Tesla! He still leads the dead end string theory!
  • @phantom5573
    This is tantalizing Dr. Keating. We really need to have Eric Weinstein and Michio have a discussion. It would be entertaining and maybe we call could all learn something.
  • He is absolutely correct. The general public need figures who can make physics interesting to them. In turn, physicists need the public to become more interested. It’s a win for everyone.
  • @Markoul11
    Correct me if I'm wrong but the spacetime dimension number limitation extrapolated by the neutron star merger to 3+1 was referring to non-compact dimension theories and not for compact dimensions within the normal spacetime?