[Preview] Can "randomness" exist?

Thanks

Keep your content online pls. It’s needed in this world

🕊️🥰✌️ powerful truth no “B.S” 😉

Very true. Also, on a slightly unrelated note, I was wondering if you were aware of any influence from Alfred Whitehead on Chris Langan’s work. I’ve been learning increasingly about the CTMU alongside Whitehead’s cosmology and the similarities are striking. In fact, though my knowledge of both Whitehead and the CTMU is novice, I’ve yet to note a significant point of departure of Langan from Whitehead. I suppose Langan’s allowance for other-worlds after death is more speculative than Whitehead, but I doubt Whitehead would deny the possibility of such a thing. If you are at all familiar with Whitehead’s work, I would love to hear your thoughts.

WOW, I just had a thought about how people might try to create a fundamental theory of reality of reality based on 'absolute randomness' earlier today. I guess reality is not random after all 😂😇🥰😎 ❤unity❤😎 informal, inclined attempted integration. for anything CTMU related below I claim no advance understanding of it nor of correct conceptualization of its 'meriological synergy'/MU(Mulitplex unity of self-dual identity). Bernard, I will respond to your comment to my comment from the prior video, in the next video or in a video of relevance; I promise to the best of my ability to not leave you hanging without a comment. my future seems ambiguously indeterminate, but I am hopeful for change and am not totally mentally stunned by my fears and challenges in my life. I seek wisdom and true mental coherence. I feel I do not have an appropriately genuine answer in creating a meaningful dialogue of the phenomenology phase of the CTMU on the level of real theorization. Although my response will be informal, but nevertheless I believe that it will be a stream of 'inspiration' of meta processes that will create a perceptual growth descriptive of a logical inclusion beneficial for logical theology/holotheology/CTMU theology/universal love; I am not sure which part of the CTMU is useful as category to explain the level of 'reality stratum discourse' we are talking about, but i'll leave that for you. I am not sure what the response will be, but i feel committed to meta-ethics and moment-to-moment catalyzing of perception for which my personal beingness is not ready to give a comment that is equivalently meritous to your comment in terms of comprehension that is useful for perceptual closure of max/min telor to telor communication for valid self-configuration of design phases of qulia and meaning that will aid('syntactically elevate') in our mutually relevant lives of ontological freedom, under the perspective of an all-encompassing unity for purposive teleological 3Cs. I am not sure if I can due to my lack of internalizing of the CTMU. So it will be vernacular and informal, with very little consistency concerning meta-formal contexts and other technical aspects therein the CTMU. verily intuitive and no prudence for theoretic context. I will say that I am completely inspired by you and by the reality analytic closure* you have achieved around the CTMU meta-formal context of the Reality Principle and concerning CTMU dual equivalence of an aspect of self-dual identity. Although the more I live life humbly the more metaphysical extensive and intensive aspects of synchronicities for which i do not grasp their current meaning in my life come into fruition and for which i notice more unity as an outgrowth of a non-separation stance between people in my life; the more I don't want to take advantage of people, even my 'enemies'. For example I thought of people trying to create an absolute randomness theory of deep reality before this video and now the video dropped into my recommendations because I believe I was open enough to receive a meta-process that coupled to this current experiance. IS this meta formal instantiation of a so-called informal experiance, from first person perspective of ignorance, proof of the G.O.D. I feel 'beholden' to unity because of the epistemic and ontic intelligibility experienced from within my own eyes🤯😇🥰😌 ❤❤❤

Good evening my friend. A tangential question: would you happen to have something like a glossary/dictionary that you could share of terms relevant to your philosophy, or the CTMU? I know it kind of carries a pastiche and musty connotation in circa nowadays, but many philosophers have modeled after Euclid in explicitly setting forth their definitions and axioms and postulates at the beginning of their project. Another question—I have returned to your channel off and on sporadically and cannot help but notice how generous you seem to be with your own time in attending to others. Do you have something like a Patreon ..?

Do you have a video where you explain where memories are stored?

Mathematical Metaphysics and others, please forgive me for being off-topic. I'm looking for someone to work with me on something. Have you read the book or seen the movie "Flowers for Algernon". This parallels something occuring in my life. It isn't a joke. If you have a heart and a brain, reply to this and we'll be able to connect hopefully.