What is mRNA ?

If the Modified-RNA lasts longer to cause the production of the spike protein, then the immune system is preoccupied and not vigilant to other pathogens.

The Phizzler executive said it was modified RNA not mRNA. There's a difference

Dr Richard Fleming says MRNA outside the cell is a prion. This engineered atrocity is not human MRNA.

True....BUT.. The mRNA that is in the new injections stands for " modified RNA"... Not a misconception, but rather informed individuals..

mRNA in the shots is MODIFIED RNA, and should have been named differently. It is not MESSENGER. The two are different in that mRNA is organic and modified is not. I chose to trust Robert Malone and ChatGPT on this.

What a great surprise! Thank you Dr R, for the education on mRNA. Chilling to understand what has been foisted on the human race on such a large scale. We may not know the extent for years.

What is mRNA ? THAT DEPENDS ON WHOSE mRNA IT IS. God's mRNA or evil's xXXX.

There's been confusion all round on this because most of the public were unfamiliar with what the 'm' in mRNA stood for. Well, that, and what 'RNA' stands for and its function in the human body 😬. I enjoy your videos, Mikolaj, thank you. I think you're someone with high integrity, someone I'd enjoy having a beer with. That said... to me, there appears to be a disconnect between your obvious intellect regarding how extraordinarily complex eukaryote and prokaryote cells are and your thinking that it's a good idea for 'scientists' to play around with human's (and other organism's) genomics and cell machinery. The human body - including the cells that comprise it - DO NOT and NEVER WILL behave linearly. It is ALWAYS going to be a bad idea to play around with 'gene therapies' - FULL STOP. The human body, including its immune system, is extraordinarily fine-tuned to handle foreign bodies, including viruses, bacteria, toxins etc. There was ABSOLUTELY NO NEED EVER to tamper with what was already a perfect system. For those that got vaccinated, this may no longer be the case. Scientists were ABSOLUTELY AWARE of the persistence, and hence dangers, of pseudouridine-doped mRNA BEFORE the mRNA vaccines were administered. These scientists were also ABSOLUTELY AWARE of the persistence and accumulation of the nanolipids - used to encapsulate the synthetic mRNA strands - in organs throughout the body. To put this in perspective... which of you in the scientific community could ever have thought, and continue to believe, it was a good idea to introduce a 'therapy' into the human body that creates a KNOWN cytotoxin - the spike protein??? As scientists who are involved in genomics, you, and your colleagues, have a duty of care to those in the public, the majority of whom are completely ignorant and naive to what is going on and the dangers involved. When enough people realise what has happened and the, potentially, irreversible downstream damage that has been caused, they'll see the roll-out of the mRNA 'vaccines' for what they really are - a deliberate poisoning.

We learned this in grade 12 high school... well maybe not everyone.....

Hi Doc, let me prefix this, you are one of my favourite doctors on this subject, top 5 i never met in general, I think you're honest and a good person, brave to cover what many won't mRNA has been gaslit a lot, "messenger" (natural) "modified" N1-methyl-pseudouridine (you have it for years/ ribosomal frameshifting) Just incase you were not aware, from the coincidence analyst angle ❤️🙏

According to the subtitles, you said vaccinal mrna was isolated from human hearts 3 days from vaccination. Could you clarify the time period as there was a wind gust when you said the number of days and it was a little hard to hear. Thanks doc, great work!!

The fact that the mRNA sequence for the vax is much shorter than the virus itself, does that suggest that the ribosome could make copies of the spike at a much higher rate than the entire virus?

Beautiful Country you live in. Thank you for the scenery. I'm in the Ocean everyday before work. It keeps me healthy and positive And so does your channel..Thank you.

Question not addressed in video is how tight are the internal cell CONTROLS for spike protein production rate, quantity, duration, and quality comparing mRNA versus classical dead or partial virus vaccine such as polio. I have not read anywhere this aspect for vaccine quality control being addressed. Second question is what characteristics caused mRNA to be chosen over dead or partial virus? Was mRNA vaccine chosen for low cost or ability to produce large volume spike protein quickly? In my opinion this is irresponsible for government health officials to not disclose why mRNA was chosen with advantages and test results comparison so citizens are aware of consequences. Good concepts in these videos promotes discussion leading to understanding that helps everyone.

The part I was worried about was genetic contamination which they said was not possible and now we find out our gene pool may very well be contaminated due to reverse transcription. Any thoughts on that one?

But.... Modified mRNA are 'modified messenger RNA' and are synthetic messenger RNA and are not natural mRNA..

Very good and long overdue explanation. 👍

I love that stream behind you! Your videoes are nice because you film outdoors, and are very informative! A win-win!!

Hey, seems like the subject of G M O , Genetically modified organisms shot directly into human bodies , That’s stuff comes with warnings on foods?

You're right, I thought MRNA was foreign material. Created in a lab