Stephen Hawking view on God | Science vs God

Nothing created God, and even if something created God then that God can’t be the all powerful God We’re worshipping!

Bro I don't get it why this YouTuber does not get likes cause he makes such good content

This video touches on complex topics that intersect science and philosophy, two different domains with divergent methods for approaching truth. I wanted to provide some perspectives on the issues raised: - Stephen Hawking did not attempt to disprove God using scientific theories. As a scientist, he understood that God is by definition outside the scope of scientific inquiry. However, Hawking preferred empirical scientific explanations over metaphysical ideas. - There is no scientific consensus that the universe was created from "nothing." Furthermore, the concept of creation lies more in the realm of religion rather than science. Scientifically, one assumes matter and energy exist in different forms rather than being created. - No evidence in science points to the universe or its rules being consciously created. As mentioned prior, creation falls under a religious framework, not a scientific one. The prevailing scientific view is that the matter and energy preceding the Big Bang expanded to form the observable universe today.

imam Ali was asked how do you see God he replied : Eyes can never see God, but hearts with proper belief can recognize God. God is close to everything, but not attached to things; is away from everything, but is no stranger to them; is a speaker, not through thinking or thought; is determined, not by desire or wish; is creator/maker, not by hands or legs; is kind and friendly, and that is not secret or hidden; is great not by oppression; can see but not with external senses; is kind, but not touchy; the heads and faces fall down (prostrate) due to God’s greatness; and the hearts are restless due to fearing God

Here's what truly perplexes and enrages religious people of all faiths: Even if there is a god, it's nothing remotely like what's in your particular superstitious texts. Even if a deist agrees that there might be a god, there's zero chance that it's like the monsters described in the bible, the quoran, the Torah or any other man-made book of nonsense. So, believers, I'll grant you that there's a god, but it's not the one you get to describe and create out of your fevered, terrified minds. Amen.

Timestamp to Steven hawking view?

Hawkings concept of god is the multiverse, totally un-provable...I kinda find this amusing , the two sides are not so different these days.

Zero is the sum of positive and negative. Wow! That's an inspiration! ❤🥰

God either left us or never existed in the first place.

You could not evolve even a single gene randomly from scratch. Let us calculate the probability of doing so. One of the simplest viral RNA sequences is only 400 base pairs long (and represents a very poor ribosomal molecule). Let's say this is all you need to start life, which is obviously not enough (we'd need at least 250 more genes at ~1000 base pairs each for a functional cell). Let there be a trillion trillion Earths, each with an ocean made entirely of amino acids (1.4E24 kg ocean per planet, 110 DA per amino acid, yielding 7.7E45 amino acids per planet). Let the entire sequence of these amino acids be combined into a single chain on each planet, giving the highest possibility of forming at least one correct sequence in the entire chain. Let these Earths randomly recombine their sequence of amino acids at a rate of a million times per second for 100 trillion years (until the last star dies). You are left with approximately 7.7E89 total combinations across this period. Now, let us set up the odds of assembling the correct sequence. The odds that an event occurs can be approximated as one minus the odds the event does not occur after a given number of trials. Let the probability that we get at least one sequence of 400 base pairs in this situation be: P = 1 - (1 - 1/(4^400)) ^ 7.7E89. Compute this formula in Wolfram Alpha to see what the odds are of life arising randomly. To those who will argue the Universe is infinite / infinitely cyclical, this would mean you also believe Planet Mountain Dew, Star Wars, and the Purple Flying Spaghetti Monster were/are/will be real. Yet you still do not believe an unmade creator / eternal designer is real? Let me put it this way. It is more reasonable to believe in a creator God than it is to believe life evolved randomly.

Before I was baptized in California, I met a false god who called himself as crazy monk in Taiwan university's second graduate student's dormitory when I was watching TV. After that I realized that spiritual persons' existence. So I believed God finally.

Hawkins was true about God not having enough time to create the universe, except for him thinking that God works inside time space. God created time. So he is beyond time. That also says that God doesn't need a past creator necessarily. Because there is no past for God. The whole timeline is present to him. He has created the past, the present and the future for his creations.

Which universe are you referring to; there has been not one but many, and they did not come from nothing but dependent on on other factors.

Thats very intellectually appealing and balanced conclusion for looking at the universe in all modesty. Though I hope you could touch over the point of human consciousness as well. We all believe as if we or other living creatures have 'will' to work against what is physically determined from the time of Bigbang and trust its 'rationality' behind it. If it is indeed a some kind of substance or realm, we truely have something beyond matter, space and energy. However if it is really just about nothing other than those matters, as we are also strictly obeyed by the same principle, it will be irrational to believe that our brain is formed such a way that it can function as the rational tool and do something of its own will. I'm very intrigued by this idea. Nonetheless, these are the questions many brilliants come out with and suggest unthinkable answers. And I think it's wonderful to have open mind over these questions rather than use them as weapons to opposing ideas. I like your videos!

Yes.... Who created God? This my all time question from childhood when my mother told me about god.... I thought I would find the answer in future with the help of highly qualified peoples.... But now I understand that our brain doesn't support that "answer" ... because of our limitations in this reality of life....... Well I'm happy that I know many things better than average people who believe in "faith"

8:40 How about speed of black hole?

“Absence of Evidence does not mean Evidence of Absence” Dr. Carl Segan

Science has no need for supersition.

where tf does that particle before the big bang come from tho

God is a psychological coping mechanism invented by men, a symbolic character in the dramas we create about our own desires and fears. Just because Gold is a product of the human mind doesn't mean he isn't "real," other products of the human mind, such as language, law, art and customs, are real and not to be dismissed.